Comments shared bicycle is not shared economic profit model is still not clear 3edyy

Comments: shared bicycle is not shared economic profit model is still not clear what is the four aunt Lv Xinjie too effect? The movie "raise the red lantern", Gong Li played four Chiam too in order to compete, pretending to be pregnant, her logic is pseudopregnancy, but because the master can attract more attention, there will be more chance of pregnancy, a long time, it becomes pregnant pregnant. An enterprise or a project, although the strength is not enough, but if the "pseudo", can attract more attention and public funds, even if the initial bubble exists, but later is solid, this is the four Chiam too effect. The v-mobile bicycle, ofo (Online Fuse Offline integration of online and offline) headed by bike sharing bicycle has become hot up, the media stir, the capital blitz, allegedly about a month’s time, OFO and Mobell has completed a total of 5 round of financing, even some companies only by App and did not carry out substantive operations will be added get tens of millions of financing, sharing has become a bicycle after another car sharing network about economic star field. Indeed, compared with the traditional municipal bicycle, bike sharing as the representative of the v-mobile gets rid of the parking pile, the use of new technology of intelligent unlocking and convenient mobile payment. However, is the so-called shared bike really a shared economy? Can the progress of operation and technology bring innovation in the profit model? I think the answer is negative, the current sharing of bicycle "pseudopregnancy" too. The bicycle is not sharing the sharing economy sharing economy refers to the use of the Internet and other modern information technology integration, sharing massive decentralized idle resources, fast and efficient to meet the diverse needs of economic activities. Therefore, enough suppliers and enough the common participation is the precondition of economic development to share. While the v-mobile bike started the independent research and development, their production obviously does not belong to a shared economic category, and only do the campus market era OFO have shared teacher-student E-bike, but after the vision will be put to the broader social market seems to deviate from the path of development. Currently 90% of its vehicles for self, only a share of 10% vehicles. Do not you see many areas covered with dust and the quality can bike, if this massive idle bike out to share, it is a shared economy, the real bicycle field now, this goal can not be achieved. One of the reasons is because the owner would not cause based on trust, and bike sharing cars and houses and the thought of sharing is not the same, the car can share because there is always the driver to follow, not because of their houses can share away, ideas can be shared because the owner won’t lose what, but do not share the bicycle; on the other hand is a platform the enterprise is unable to find the method and mode of the ordinary bicycle with high efficiency and low cost sharing. Although a lot of idle resources, but to the small campus market share model to promote the social market there are still obstacles. Since the shared bicycle does not have the conditions of idle resources sharing, then it does not share the characteristics of the economy. On the one hand, the idle resources under the shared economy相关的主题文章:

« »

Comments closed.